<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marchex lists their domains for sale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/comment-page-1#comment-68528</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6024#comment-68528</guid>
		<description>Sales fell by 44 percent 2Q

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2009606257_webmarchex05.html

results

http://www.streetinsider.com/Press+Releases/Marchex+Reports+Second+Quarter+2009+Financial+Results/4849015.html

well they better start acting and try selling whatever names they have for reasonable prices. Otherwise the man with the big hammer comes and smashes it all to pieces.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sales fell by 44 percent 2Q</p>
<p><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2009606257_webmarchex05.html" rel="nofollow">http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2009606257_webmarchex05.html</a></p>
<p>results</p>
<p><a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Press+Releases/Marchex+Reports+Second+Quarter+2009+Financial+Results/4849015.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.streetinsider.com/Press+Releases/Marchex+Reports+Second+Quarter+2009+Financial+Results/4849015.html</a></p>
<p>well they better start acting and try selling whatever names they have for reasonable prices. Otherwise the man with the big hammer comes and smashes it all to pieces.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investor Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/comment-page-1#comment-68513</link>
		<dc:creator>Investor Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6024#comment-68513</guid>
		<description>Sams right. They have 200,000 names over $500 million in cash injected into their company and they still make a loss!  This means a lot!

Also a good test is go to mdnhinc.com pick any of thei listed domain names and type it into google. The results speaks for themselves. Their names are worth nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sams right. They have 200,000 names over $500 million in cash injected into their company and they still make a loss!  This means a lot!</p>
<p>Also a good test is go to mdnhinc.com pick any of thei listed domain names and type it into google. The results speaks for themselves. Their names are worth nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/comment-page-1#comment-68495</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6024#comment-68495</guid>
		<description>Be serious - they&#039;ve had these domains for a while now, used them up for all their worth. I&#039;d say with all the SEM they blasted these pages with in the past that anyone whose purchasing them may find out that a lot are blacklisted by Google - so it may take a moment to get your SEO plan working.

In the end - the reason why they are selling these domains is because they can&#039;t make money from them....but nor can anyone without a content plan to make the site worth anything in the first place.

The days on one stop sites with cool names is done. It&#039;s about your businesses ability to monetize, your content, apps, and how well you execute SEO and online marketing It doens&#039;t need to be angry.com, it could be angry123.com - it you have the right content and biz model - you can make money without a  pretty name.

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be serious &#8211; they&#8217;ve had these domains for a while now, used them up for all their worth. I&#8217;d say with all the SEM they blasted these pages with in the past that anyone whose purchasing them may find out that a lot are blacklisted by Google &#8211; so it may take a moment to get your SEO plan working.</p>
<p>In the end &#8211; the reason why they are selling these domains is because they can&#8217;t make money from them&#8230;.but nor can anyone without a content plan to make the site worth anything in the first place.</p>
<p>The days on one stop sites with cool names is done. It&#8217;s about your businesses ability to monetize, your content, apps, and how well you execute SEO and online marketing It doens&#8217;t need to be angry.com, it could be angry123.com &#8211; it you have the right content and biz model &#8211; you can make money without a  pretty name.</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buy steroids</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/comment-page-1#comment-68392</link>
		<dc:creator>buy steroids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6024#comment-68392</guid>
		<description>personally im looking to buy premium domains,
the way i see it is ist all about the revenue
possible to generate as to budget,
if a domain has pr4 - 5 and revenue is 4- 8k /month
then the asking price should be based on that,
its that simple and can be good value,

regards dale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally im looking to buy premium domains,<br />
the way i see it is ist all about the revenue<br />
possible to generate as to budget,<br />
if a domain has pr4 &#8211; 5 and revenue is 4- 8k /month<br />
then the asking price should be based on that,<br />
its that simple and can be good value,</p>
<p>regards dale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/comment-page-1#comment-68390</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6024#comment-68390</guid>
		<description>Interesting article and responses. However, many seem to be missing a point or two here. There&#039;s more than meets the eye. 

If you pay attention, you will notice that they are not selling any high RPC domain names out of their portfolio, shortail or longtail. It seems to me they are pruning and consolidating. It does not matter, 1 word, 2 words, or 3 words domain name, if it cannot make enough money to justify its expense, it&#039;s not worth keeping.

In time domainers will learn to pay great attention to the product or service viability of any given name before spending their money on it, no matter how short or long it is, character-wise or word-wise. 

Traffic quality anyone? Many focus on keyword density of a given page. How about the keyword density of the domain name itself especially when it comes to click through rate, conversion rate, and search revenue? How does it relate to products and services people actually search for? Is it targeted or not? For example, many of the high bid search terms out there are not the shortest of search terms.

Just some things to think about!

Regards to all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article and responses. However, many seem to be missing a point or two here. There&#8217;s more than meets the eye. </p>
<p>If you pay attention, you will notice that they are not selling any high RPC domain names out of their portfolio, shortail or longtail. It seems to me they are pruning and consolidating. It does not matter, 1 word, 2 words, or 3 words domain name, if it cannot make enough money to justify its expense, it&#8217;s not worth keeping.</p>
<p>In time domainers will learn to pay great attention to the product or service viability of any given name before spending their money on it, no matter how short or long it is, character-wise or word-wise. </p>
<p>Traffic quality anyone? Many focus on keyword density of a given page. How about the keyword density of the domain name itself especially when it comes to click through rate, conversion rate, and search revenue? How does it relate to products and services people actually search for? Is it targeted or not? For example, many of the high bid search terms out there are not the shortest of search terms.</p>
<p>Just some things to think about!</p>
<p>Regards to all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshP</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/comment-page-1#comment-68389</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6024#comment-68389</guid>
		<description>I bet you know just the auction platform too ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet you know just the auction platform too ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monte</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/comment-page-1#comment-68385</link>
		<dc:creator>Monte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6024#comment-68385</guid>
		<description>http://seattle.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2009/02/16/daily38.html

Marchex reports $129M Q4 loss

No use trying to talk good of a company losing this much money! whatever their current strategy is it clearly has not been working.

They would better to list all their names for sale and get what they can for them in a very competitive market.

You might note many of the mdnh inc names / marchex names are now just monetized via Google Syndication. This should tell you they have realized their own monetization and development plans where not working. 

But say they just sell each name for $1000 they will be far ahead of where they are now. Crazy &quot;NO&quot; it makes more sense to be making a profit than making a loss!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://seattle.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2009/02/16/daily38.html" rel="nofollow">http://seattle.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2009/02/16/daily38.html</a></p>
<p>Marchex reports $129M Q4 loss</p>
<p>No use trying to talk good of a company losing this much money! whatever their current strategy is it clearly has not been working.</p>
<p>They would better to list all their names for sale and get what they can for them in a very competitive market.</p>
<p>You might note many of the mdnh inc names / marchex names are now just monetized via Google Syndication. This should tell you they have realized their own monetization and development plans where not working. </p>
<p>But say they just sell each name for $1000 they will be far ahead of where they are now. Crazy &#8220;NO&#8221; it makes more sense to be making a profit than making a loss!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Brean</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/comment-page-1#comment-68384</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Brean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6024#comment-68384</guid>
		<description>http://www.google.com/search?q=marchex%20loss&amp;hl=en&amp;ned=au&amp;tab=nw

Massive losses!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=marchex%20loss&#038;hl=en&#038;ned=au&#038;tab=nw" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=marchex%20loss&#038;hl=en&#038;ned=au&#038;tab=nw</a></p>
<p>Massive losses!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beachie</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/comment-page-1#comment-68382</link>
		<dc:creator>Beachie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6024#comment-68382</guid>
		<description>@snoopy

sales@ireit.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@snoopy</p>
<p><a href="mailto:sales@ireit.com">sales@ireit.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoopy</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-sales/marchex-lists-domains-sale/6024/comment-page-1#comment-68379</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoopy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6024#comment-68379</guid>
		<description>&quot;iREIT’s asking prices are steep&quot;

They are still in business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;iREIT’s asking prices are steep&#8221;</p>
<p>They are still in business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

