<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .CM Auctions and Typo Traffic &#8211; What Are These Domains Really Worth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/comment-page-1#comment-66314</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5519#comment-66314</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the $175 exactly what will keep the scammers away?  I saw someone posting that they should charge 1 Euro.... imagine what would happen if they did that!

Scams happen when you can arbitrage the price of the domain and revenue from the scam.  I&#039;m sure that at this price some will be profitable but NOT that many. 

Sounds like some of you are pissed off to find out you won&#039;t be making easy money from .CM.  To me, that&#039;s a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the $175 exactly what will keep the scammers away?  I saw someone posting that they should charge 1 Euro&#8230;. imagine what would happen if they did that!</p>
<p>Scams happen when you can arbitrage the price of the domain and revenue from the scam.  I&#8217;m sure that at this price some will be profitable but NOT that many. </p>
<p>Sounds like some of you are pissed off to find out you won&#8217;t be making easy money from .CM.  To me, that&#8217;s a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jokes</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/comment-page-1#comment-66293</link>
		<dc:creator>jokes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5519#comment-66293</guid>
		<description>Also I don&#039;t think that the big companies can do anything about the typos. It&#039;s an other think homes.com and homes.cm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I don&#8217;t think that the big companies can do anything about the typos. It&#8217;s an other think homes.com and homes.cm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: humor</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/comment-page-1#comment-66292</link>
		<dc:creator>humor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5519#comment-66292</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t intend to spent $175 a year for a typo (expept sex.cm )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t intend to spent $175 a year for a typo (expept sex.cm )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/comment-page-1#comment-66249</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5519#comment-66249</guid>
		<description>...Trademark attorneys are warning companies about a new target for cybersquatters known as &quot;.cm,&quot;...

here we go: http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202432459261</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Trademark attorneys are warning companies about a new target for cybersquatters known as &#8220;.cm,&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>here we go: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202432459261" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202432459261</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sertleşme</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/comment-page-1#comment-66248</link>
		<dc:creator>Sertleşme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5519#comment-66248</guid>
		<description>Wow, 175$/year was very steep indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, 175$/year was very steep indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estimating type in traffic for a domain — DomainTweeter</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/comment-page-1#comment-66244</link>
		<dc:creator>Estimating type in traffic for a domain — DomainTweeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5519#comment-66244</guid>
		<description>[...] keyword .com domain.   I thought this might be a useful exercise after reading DomainNameNews.com recent editorial on .CM Typo Traffic and plan to write a follow up post applying this formula to alternate domains [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] keyword .com domain.   I thought this might be a useful exercise after reading DomainNameNews.com recent editorial on .CM Typo Traffic and plan to write a follow up post applying this formula to alternate domains [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EM @ KING.NET</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/comment-page-1#comment-66237</link>
		<dc:creator>EM @ KING.NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5519#comment-66237</guid>
		<description>I wrote a similar opinion last June not to register .CM.
http://www.king.net/2009/06/cm-sunrise-period-opens-at-eurodns.html

Cheers,
EM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a similar opinion last June not to register .CM.<br />
<a href="http://www.king.net/2009/06/cm-sunrise-period-opens-at-eurodns.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.king.net/2009/06/cm-sunrise-period-opens-at-eurodns.html</a></p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
EM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/comment-page-1#comment-66229</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5519#comment-66229</guid>
		<description>Countries like Cameroon, Colombia, Niger and Ethiopia should be ashamed. They should have all complained to IANA when they go their ccTLD extension and the people who came up with ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 as well, because they caused the problem in the first place.

The well know auction houses should also be closed down, as they all have auctioned trademark domains. Let&#039;s burn them down.

I must also agree that .CM is too expensive. They shouldn&#039;t be allowed to charge more than 1 Euro. 

ICANN should take domains away from the .com holder which only park the domains, because they don&#039;t provide useful content. Let&#039;s kill domain parking. 

BTW, only US trademarks should be allowed, the rest of the countries are scammers.

Did I forget anything ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Countries like Cameroon, Colombia, Niger and Ethiopia should be ashamed. They should have all complained to IANA when they go their ccTLD extension and the people who came up with ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 as well, because they caused the problem in the first place.</p>
<p>The well know auction houses should also be closed down, as they all have auctioned trademark domains. Let&#8217;s burn them down.</p>
<p>I must also agree that .CM is too expensive. They shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to charge more than 1 Euro. </p>
<p>ICANN should take domains away from the .com holder which only park the domains, because they don&#8217;t provide useful content. Let&#8217;s kill domain parking. </p>
<p>BTW, only US trademarks should be allowed, the rest of the countries are scammers.</p>
<p>Did I forget anything ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/comment-page-1#comment-66228</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5519#comment-66228</guid>
		<description>@Scott Roberts
If my father would be alive I am certain he would be proud of me. Also all people I know/friends would say &quot;Ha, that&#039;s smart (if you can get at least the reg. fee money back)&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott Roberts<br />
If my father would be alive I am certain he would be proud of me. Also all people I know/friends would say &#8220;Ha, that&#8217;s smart (if you can get at least the reg. fee money back)&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/cm-auctions-typo-traffic-domains-worth/5519/comment-page-1#comment-66224</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5519#comment-66224</guid>
		<description>The other benefit Kevin Ham had that many don&#039;t talk about is he could do the inverse math that dcmike just did. You have the .cm and you know it gets .3-.6% of the .com so now you know how much the .com would be worth to you. Pretty valuable insight when chasing dropping domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other benefit Kevin Ham had that many don&#8217;t talk about is he could do the inverse math that dcmike just did. You have the .cm and you know it gets .3-.6% of the .com so now you know how much the .com would be worth to you. Pretty valuable insight when chasing dropping domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

