<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domains &#8211; all that glitters are not diamonds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 7/22-7/28: Domain Name News weekly highlights &#187; Domain Name News</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160/comment-page-1#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>7/22-7/28: Domain Name News weekly highlights &#187; Domain Name News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>[...] Domains - all that glitters are not diamonds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Domains &#8211; all that glitters are not diamonds [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Davids</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160/comment-page-1#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Davids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160#comment-721</guid>
		<description>Unless you own real estate in Miami Florida...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless you own real estate in Miami Florida&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160/comment-page-1#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160#comment-699</guid>
		<description>Generics for 8x.... this is fodder for a whole new article.

Let me think of a title for it:

8x is not 8x is not 8x

or 

Apples to Apples - my apple is bigger than your apple...

...you can pay 8x YOUR revenue if your revenue is higher than what the current owner is getting. For example, you might have a better rev share with the same PPC Partner, or you may have a direct relationship with a CPA Advertiser, or even a direct relationship with an advertiser willing to pay you on a per unique basis. I came across a domain that I arranged to be purchased for 13x the owner&#039;s annual revenue. Using the Traffic Splitting feature at DomainManager.com I was able to figure out which PPC Partner best optimized the domain. Now the revenue is higher, so that the amount paid is actually closer to 5 years revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generics for 8x&#8230;. this is fodder for a whole new article.</p>
<p>Let me think of a title for it:</p>
<p>8x is not 8x is not 8x</p>
<p>or </p>
<p>Apples to Apples &#8211; my apple is bigger than your apple&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;you can pay 8x YOUR revenue if your revenue is higher than what the current owner is getting. For example, you might have a better rev share with the same PPC Partner, or you may have a direct relationship with a CPA Advertiser, or even a direct relationship with an advertiser willing to pay you on a per unique basis. I came across a domain that I arranged to be purchased for 13x the owner&#8217;s annual revenue. Using the Traffic Splitting feature at DomainManager.com I was able to figure out which PPC Partner best optimized the domain. Now the revenue is higher, so that the amount paid is actually closer to 5 years revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: team chicago domainers</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160/comment-page-1#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>team chicago domainers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160#comment-697</guid>
		<description>Hey Richard---Excellent Read!

I know it&#039;s a bit OT of what the real message of your post is---but is it even still possible to find good quality generics for 8x anymore??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Richard&#8212;Excellent Read!</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s a bit OT of what the real message of your post is&#8212;but is it even still possible to find good quality generics for 8x anymore??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calculating ROI on early domain investments &#8212; Scott Fish</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160/comment-page-1#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Calculating ROI on early domain investments &#8212; Scott Fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamenews.com/editorial/domains-all-that-glitters-are-not-diamonds/160#comment-696</guid>
		<description>[...] Lau has an interesting post that points out several factors and examples to look at when calculating ROI.  If you see a domain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lau has an interesting post that points out several factors and examples to look at when calculating ROI.  If you see a domain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
