<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Ad Gets Lots of Love and Godaddy Jumps the Shark with Super Bowl Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/comment-page-1#comment-72188</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=7127#comment-72188</guid>
		<description>@StephRef the spike in traffic is a no-brainer. When you tease a mainly male audience in to going to the site because there are boobs there, you&#039;ll see a spike in traffic. I&#039;d like to see the proof on those sales records. . . really.  I can&#039;t really see someone watching the game and then going &quot;oh yeah let&#039;s look at those boobs. What there&#039;s no boobs?  oh ok let&#039;s register some domain names instead?&quot;  The most likely response is &quot;what&#039;s a domain name&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@StephRef the spike in traffic is a no-brainer. When you tease a mainly male audience in to going to the site because there are boobs there, you&#8217;ll see a spike in traffic. I&#8217;d like to see the proof on those sales records. . . really.  I can&#8217;t really see someone watching the game and then going &#8220;oh yeah let&#8217;s look at those boobs. What there&#8217;s no boobs?  oh ok let&#8217;s register some domain names instead?&#8221;  The most likely response is &#8220;what&#8217;s a domain name&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For GoDaddy, Last Place is Better than Middle of the Pack &#124; Domaining Manual</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/comment-page-1#comment-72148</link>
		<dc:creator>For GoDaddy, Last Place is Better than Middle of the Pack &#124; Domaining Manual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=7127#comment-72148</guid>
		<description>[...] much longer can GoDaddy milk this game? Adam Strong thinks GoDaddy&#8217;s commercials jumped the shark. I&#8217;ll agree that they were pretty lame. (Take one part Danica Patrick, add girls, have them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much longer can GoDaddy milk this game? Adam Strong thinks GoDaddy&#8217;s commercials jumped the shark. I&#8217;ll agree that they were pretty lame. (Take one part Danica Patrick, add girls, have them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Domainer</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/comment-page-1#comment-72141</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=7127#comment-72141</guid>
		<description>*

Thank you, Stephen Douglas. It&#039;s refreshing to see a man who gets that women should not be treated as objects but treated as equals and praised according to their achievements and abilities, not a g-string and a purple painted body.

Soon enough, Danica Patrick&#039;s boobs will droop south, and she&#039;ll just be another has-been hag, at least in the minds of some male domainers who think with their Johnsons and not with their minds. 

Can&#039;t say that I have much respect and sympathy for such women who rent out their bodies to the highest bidder.

I have even less respect for some well-known male domainers who plaster public service ads: &quot;Stop human trafficking&quot; and then on the same page advertise tawdry events that encourage the very thing they pretend to want have stopped. What hypocrites!

Puerile and ignorant!

*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*</p>
<p>Thank you, Stephen Douglas. It&#8217;s refreshing to see a man who gets that women should not be treated as objects but treated as equals and praised according to their achievements and abilities, not a g-string and a purple painted body.</p>
<p>Soon enough, Danica Patrick&#8217;s boobs will droop south, and she&#8217;ll just be another has-been hag, at least in the minds of some male domainers who think with their Johnsons and not with their minds. </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t say that I have much respect and sympathy for such women who rent out their bodies to the highest bidder.</p>
<p>I have even less respect for some well-known male domainers who plaster public service ads: &#8220;Stop human trafficking&#8221; and then on the same page advertise tawdry events that encourage the very thing they pretend to want have stopped. What hypocrites!</p>
<p>Puerile and ignorant!</p>
<p>*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephRef</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/comment-page-1#comment-72133</link>
		<dc:creator>StephRef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=7127#comment-72133</guid>
		<description>Jumped the shark, eh? 
I just read an article that said Go Daddy broke all of their sales records and created the highest internet traffic spikes of the game. (Chart in the article)

http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/02/08/go-daddy-ad-drives-huge-traffic-spike/

I don&#039;t like the ads - but I can&#039;t deny the fact that they work.
If I were the people @ GoDaddy, I&#039;d keep doing the same thing until it stopped working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jumped the shark, eh?<br />
I just read an article that said Go Daddy broke all of their sales records and created the highest internet traffic spikes of the game. (Chart in the article)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/02/08/go-daddy-ad-drives-huge-traffic-spike/" rel="nofollow">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/02/08/go-daddy-ad-drives-huge-traffic-spike/</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the ads &#8211; but I can&#8217;t deny the fact that they work.<br />
If I were the people @ GoDaddy, I&#8217;d keep doing the same thing until it stopped working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/comment-page-1#comment-72131</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=7127#comment-72131</guid>
		<description>Everyone knows I&#039;ve been ripping GoDaddy ads for years. It&#039;s shameful to legit porn for Bob Parsons to act like he is Larry Flynt (*although the physical similarity is remarkable).

However, for domainers, there is one important question we first must ask:

HOW MUCH MONEY HAS GODADDY POURED INTO PROMOTING DOMAIN VALUES AND SPONSORING DOMAIN CONFERENCES/EVENTS IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS? Probably not more than one day&#039;s profit for them in 2010.

How sad it is for all domain professionals to have to rely on the LARGEST REGISTRAR in the world to promote the value of domaining as an IMPORTANT BUSINESS INVESTMENT?  Are all guys so gullible, and hard-up that they get &quot;excited&quot; when some pretty girl responds to a successful woman in man&#039;s world (Danica Patrick - race car driver) by ripping open her shirt to show a skimpy spaghetti string  tshirt announcing &quot;GODADDY&quot;?

Danica isn&#039;t doing her fellow woman any favors by accepting the money GD pays her to belittle her accomplishments and lure her natural feminine nature into happily &quot;performing&quot; as the &quot;pretty monkey girl&quot;.  Danica is the &quot;pretty monkey girl&quot; because she has sold her looks to a sad and old-man-pervert commercial that tries to seduce the viewer to visit Godaddy for the chance to see... what...?  boobs? 

Danica won races to end up doing this? I don&#039;t know what&#039;s more embarrassing: the fact that Danica has prostituted a proud image she had as a racing winner to GoDaddy, or that any man would buy into visiting Godaddy hoping to see something akin to objectifying women instead of learning about the value of owning a great domain name?

I&#039;m all for the right  to look at porn, but only in the privacy of Chef Patrick&#039;s kitchen!  

My point, seriously, is that GoDaddy used, very smartly, their ten page upsell to sell people what they didn&#039;t need, or convinced them they did, and built a lot of reseller sites for cheap to keep those domains coming in. I admit I was a &quot;paying&quot; reseller for Godaddy for three years. However, to show you how valuable GD views their reseller accounts, I stopped paying for the $99 reseller annual price back  in 2007. However, my site is still up and operating. I just don&#039;t get the payouts from any domains I sell on my GD seller site. 

I have more to focus  on than that  site, but now that I&#039;ve reminded myself, I&#039;m off to change my nameservers to Whypark.  Anything I can do to disconnect myself from GD, I will do. This is the albatross around the domain industry&#039;s neck:  GoDaddy ruling the roost, making us look sleazy, failing to support the domain community, and acting as if it&#039;s an island.

However, history shows us that the little chinks in the armor will become big cracks, and the little leaks will become big holes that tear down the foundation of what was once the BIGGEST, MOST COCKY, ARROGANT, and DISMISSIVE.  I say &quot;DISMISSIVE&quot; to mean that GoDaddy ignores the lords, princes, earls, kings and queens of the land they think they rule.

In time, this strategy will trap them into an outdated business concept that will cause their fortress to collapse in on them...

I&#039;m first in line to say &quot;GoDaddy - I advise that you spend your  money towards educating consumers and business owners to understanding  why domain names are valuable to their online endeavors. We can go elsewhere for the porn come-on.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows I&#8217;ve been ripping GoDaddy ads for years. It&#8217;s shameful to legit porn for Bob Parsons to act like he is Larry Flynt (*although the physical similarity is remarkable).</p>
<p>However, for domainers, there is one important question we first must ask:</p>
<p>HOW MUCH MONEY HAS GODADDY POURED INTO PROMOTING DOMAIN VALUES AND SPONSORING DOMAIN CONFERENCES/EVENTS IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS? Probably not more than one day&#8217;s profit for them in 2010.</p>
<p>How sad it is for all domain professionals to have to rely on the LARGEST REGISTRAR in the world to promote the value of domaining as an IMPORTANT BUSINESS INVESTMENT?  Are all guys so gullible, and hard-up that they get &#8220;excited&#8221; when some pretty girl responds to a successful woman in man&#8217;s world (Danica Patrick &#8211; race car driver) by ripping open her shirt to show a skimpy spaghetti string  tshirt announcing &#8220;GODADDY&#8221;?</p>
<p>Danica isn&#8217;t doing her fellow woman any favors by accepting the money GD pays her to belittle her accomplishments and lure her natural feminine nature into happily &#8220;performing&#8221; as the &#8220;pretty monkey girl&#8221;.  Danica is the &#8220;pretty monkey girl&#8221; because she has sold her looks to a sad and old-man-pervert commercial that tries to seduce the viewer to visit Godaddy for the chance to see&#8230; what&#8230;?  boobs? </p>
<p>Danica won races to end up doing this? I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s more embarrassing: the fact that Danica has prostituted a proud image she had as a racing winner to GoDaddy, or that any man would buy into visiting Godaddy hoping to see something akin to objectifying women instead of learning about the value of owning a great domain name?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for the right  to look at porn, but only in the privacy of Chef Patrick&#8217;s kitchen!  </p>
<p>My point, seriously, is that GoDaddy used, very smartly, their ten page upsell to sell people what they didn&#8217;t need, or convinced them they did, and built a lot of reseller sites for cheap to keep those domains coming in. I admit I was a &#8220;paying&#8221; reseller for Godaddy for three years. However, to show you how valuable GD views their reseller accounts, I stopped paying for the $99 reseller annual price back  in 2007. However, my site is still up and operating. I just don&#8217;t get the payouts from any domains I sell on my GD seller site. </p>
<p>I have more to focus  on than that  site, but now that I&#8217;ve reminded myself, I&#8217;m off to change my nameservers to Whypark.  Anything I can do to disconnect myself from GD, I will do. This is the albatross around the domain industry&#8217;s neck:  GoDaddy ruling the roost, making us look sleazy, failing to support the domain community, and acting as if it&#8217;s an island.</p>
<p>However, history shows us that the little chinks in the armor will become big cracks, and the little leaks will become big holes that tear down the foundation of what was once the BIGGEST, MOST COCKY, ARROGANT, and DISMISSIVE.  I say &#8220;DISMISSIVE&#8221; to mean that GoDaddy ignores the lords, princes, earls, kings and queens of the land they think they rule.</p>
<p>In time, this strategy will trap them into an outdated business concept that will cause their fortress to collapse in on them&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m first in line to say &#8220;GoDaddy &#8211; I advise that you spend your  money towards educating consumers and business owners to understanding  why domain names are valuable to their online endeavors. We can go elsewhere for the porn come-on.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/comment-page-1#comment-72130</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=7127#comment-72130</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never been impressed with GD&#039;s ads.  To me they are just sleazy, cheap ads that target the dumb and naive.  There&#039;s not much creativity IMO, just simply using sex to sell.  Shame as I&#039;ve had no problem with GD as a company but am not a fan of their ads at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never been impressed with GD&#8217;s ads.  To me they are just sleazy, cheap ads that target the dumb and naive.  There&#8217;s not much creativity IMO, just simply using sex to sell.  Shame as I&#8217;ve had no problem with GD as a company but am not a fan of their ads at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Superbowl reclame: oud nieuws? &#62; Martijncouprie.nl</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/comment-page-1#comment-72129</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Superbowl reclame: oud nieuws? &#62; Martijncouprie.nl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=7127#comment-72129</guid>
		<description>[...] Superbowl Sunday (28 of 50) van Sean Toyer Via: Domainnamenews  Dit bericht is geplaatst in Internet marketing. Bookmark de permalink . Plaats een reactie  of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Superbowl Sunday (28 of 50) van Sean Toyer Via: Domainnamenews  Dit bericht is geplaatst in Internet marketing. Bookmark de permalink . Plaats een reactie  of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebHostHottie (Natalia Gutierrez)</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/comment-page-1#comment-72128</link>
		<dc:creator>WebHostHottie (Natalia Gutierrez)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=7127#comment-72128</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/WebHostHottie&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;ccimg1&quot; title=&quot;WebHostHottie (Natalia Gutierrez)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;img name=&quot;cc_image&quot; title=&quot;WebHostHottie (Natalia Gutierrez)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;&quot; src=&quot;http://purl.org/net/spiurl/WebHostHottie&quot;/&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
Google Ad Gets Lots of Love and Godaddy Jumps the Shark with Super ...: Now that the Super Bowl game&#039;s Brand Bowl ... [link to post]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chatcatcher.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Posted using Chat Catcher&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/WebHostHottie" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"></p>
<div class="ccimg1" title="WebHostHottie (Natalia Gutierrez)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;">
<img name="cc_image" title="WebHostHottie (Natalia Gutierrez)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;" src="http://purl.org/net/spiurl/WebHostHottie"/>
</div>
<p></a><br />
Google Ad Gets Lots of Love and Godaddy Jumps the Shark with Super &#8230;: Now that the Super Bowl game&#8217;s Brand Bowl &#8230; [link to post]</p>
<p> &#8211; <a href="http://chatcatcher.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Posted using Chat Catcher</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Domainer</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/comment-page-1#comment-72112</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=7127#comment-72112</guid>
		<description>*

Super Bowl. Yawn.

Being overseas, I totally forgot about it. My colleagues at the university asked, &quot;What&#039;s a super bowl?&quot;

Priceless.

GoDaddy ads: Always a bore.

Maybe viewers are growing less stupid.

:)

*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*</p>
<p>Super Bowl. Yawn.</p>
<p>Being overseas, I totally forgot about it. My colleagues at the university asked, &#8220;What&#8217;s a super bowl?&#8221;</p>
<p>Priceless.</p>
<p>GoDaddy ads: Always a bore.</p>
<p>Maybe viewers are growing less stupid.</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/google-ad-lots-love-godaddy-jumps-shark-super-bowl-ads/7127/comment-page-1#comment-72110</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=7127#comment-72110</guid>
		<description>Godaddy ad = BIG YAWN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Godaddy ad = BIG YAWN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

