<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SnapNames Insider Bidding Aftermath &#8211; EDITORIAL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pitbullstew</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/comment-page-1#comment-70419</link>
		<dc:creator>pitbullstew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6491#comment-70419</guid>
		<description>keep movng keep moving nothing to see here folks keep moving...
&gt; Our File Number: FF++++-09
&gt; Complaint About: Snapnames.com Inc.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Thank you for the information that you sent us. Although there does not now appear to be a need for an investigation or legal action, we will keep your information on file as part of the public record. 
&gt; 
&gt; Our primary goal is to identify and eliminate the most serious marketplace violations, and many factors are considered in determining what cases we should pursue. 
&gt; 
&gt; We appreciate the time that you took to alert us to a possible problem in the marketplace. Your information may prove to be valuable in a future enforcement action.
&gt; 
&gt; If you need to contact us about your complaint, please write to me and note your file number: FF++++-09, or contact me by phone at 503-934-4400 or e-mail at mailto:heather.j.mcfarlanemartinez@state.or.us
&gt; 
&gt; Heather McFarlane-Martinez
&gt; Enforcement Officer
&gt; Financial Fraud/Consumer Protection Section
&gt; Oregon Department of Justice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep movng keep moving nothing to see here folks keep moving&#8230;<br />
&gt; Our File Number: FF++++-09<br />
&gt; Complaint About: Snapnames.com Inc.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Thank you for the information that you sent us. Although there does not now appear to be a need for an investigation or legal action, we will keep your information on file as part of the public record.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Our primary goal is to identify and eliminate the most serious marketplace violations, and many factors are considered in determining what cases we should pursue.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; We appreciate the time that you took to alert us to a possible problem in the marketplace. Your information may prove to be valuable in a future enforcement action.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; If you need to contact us about your complaint, please write to me and note your file number: FF++++-09, or contact me by phone at 503-934-4400 or e-mail at mailto:heather.j.mcfarlanemartinez@state.or.us<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Heather McFarlane-Martinez<br />
&gt; Enforcement Officer<br />
&gt; Financial Fraud/Consumer Protection Section<br />
&gt; Oregon Department of Justice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/comment-page-1#comment-70331</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6491#comment-70331</guid>
		<description>@pat mike at thedomains.com has written several pieces about registrars hoarding domains and specifically Tucows.  I don&#039;t remember what I&#039;ve written but I&#039;m very much opposed to the practice and would be happy to shed more light on it. Send us all your tips and experiences if you like to editor@domainnamenews.com  

@bob you speak as if you know more . &quot;the inability of the vast majority of us to acquire an expired domain except through SnapNames, Namejet, or Pool auction, than I am that he got bit in the ass by an employee.&quot;  &quot;collusion and restraint of trade&quot; ?   
Do tell . What would you propose would be the best way to reallocate expired domains ?
Please feel free to contact us at the above email as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pat mike at thedomains.com has written several pieces about registrars hoarding domains and specifically Tucows.  I don&#8217;t remember what I&#8217;ve written but I&#8217;m very much opposed to the practice and would be happy to shed more light on it. Send us all your tips and experiences if you like to <a href="mailto:editor@domainnamenews.com">editor@domainnamenews.com</a>  </p>
<p>@bob you speak as if you know more . &#8220;the inability of the vast majority of us to acquire an expired domain except through SnapNames, Namejet, or Pool auction, than I am that he got bit in the ass by an employee.&#8221;  &#8220;collusion and restraint of trade&#8221; ?<br />
Do tell . What would you propose would be the best way to reallocate expired domains ?<br />
Please feel free to contact us at the above email as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/comment-page-1#comment-70324</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6491#comment-70324</guid>
		<description>Code of Conduct? Yeah right.

This is an &quot;industry&quot; where a major registrar, Tucows (among others), every day just appropriates (read &quot;steals&quot;) expired domain names. Where&#039;s the outrage at that? They brag about it to their shareholders for crying out loud. WTF???

ICANN is an utter joke. There is no credible supervision for any of these clowns.

Bend over domainers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Code of Conduct? Yeah right.</p>
<p>This is an &#8220;industry&#8221; where a major registrar, Tucows (among others), every day just appropriates (read &#8220;steals&#8221;) expired domain names. Where&#8217;s the outrage at that? They brag about it to their shareholders for crying out loud. WTF???</p>
<p>ICANN is an utter joke. There is no credible supervision for any of these clowns.</p>
<p>Bend over domainers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Aronin</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/comment-page-1#comment-70320</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Aronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6491#comment-70320</guid>
		<description>Wow! What a surprise! Domain auctions aren&#039;t always on the up-and-up!

In an industry where absolute control of product, supply lines, distribution channels and pricing is in the hands of vertical monopolies and inter-locking, inter-related major corporate interests, this attention on the misadventures of Nelson/Whoever-Whatsis is akin to concern about a pimple in a sea of acne.

An employee of a company engaged in rigging the aftermarket was caught rigging a few auctions? And, he learned how to do so by working where and watching whom?

Monte Cahn&#039;s made a personal fortune, in part, by gaming a system he was instrumental in building. It&#039;s an admirable achievement, regardless. But, I&#039;m a lot more concerned about the inability of the vast majority of us to acquire an expired domain except through SnapNames, Namejet, or Pool auction, than I am that he got bit in the ass by an employee. 

It would be a shame if this incident detracted from the essential, overall focus on industry-wide collusion and restraint of trade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! What a surprise! Domain auctions aren&#8217;t always on the up-and-up!</p>
<p>In an industry where absolute control of product, supply lines, distribution channels and pricing is in the hands of vertical monopolies and inter-locking, inter-related major corporate interests, this attention on the misadventures of Nelson/Whoever-Whatsis is akin to concern about a pimple in a sea of acne.</p>
<p>An employee of a company engaged in rigging the aftermarket was caught rigging a few auctions? And, he learned how to do so by working where and watching whom?</p>
<p>Monte Cahn&#8217;s made a personal fortune, in part, by gaming a system he was instrumental in building. It&#8217;s an admirable achievement, regardless. But, I&#8217;m a lot more concerned about the inability of the vast majority of us to acquire an expired domain except through SnapNames, Namejet, or Pool auction, than I am that he got bit in the ass by an employee. </p>
<p>It would be a shame if this incident detracted from the essential, overall focus on industry-wide collusion and restraint of trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/comment-page-1#comment-70236</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6491#comment-70236</guid>
		<description>Halvarez to be named sniper of the year 
 LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halvarez to be named sniper of the year<br />
 LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pitbullstew</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/comment-page-1#comment-70200</link>
		<dc:creator>pitbullstew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6491#comment-70200</guid>
		<description>Ripoffreport.com-July 24 2006

Report: Snapnames.com
Category: Internet Services

Snapnames.com ripoff Portland Oregon
*UPDATE by author... 
 
Snapnames.com
Phone:  800-385 4075
Fax:  503-274 9749 115 NW 1st Ave, Suite 300
Portland, Oregon 97209
U.S.A.

Submitted: Monday, July 24, 2006
Last posting: Friday, November 06, 2009  
venice, California


Snapnames.com is a company that registers internet domain nmaes. In this example when I searched for a business their domain name had expired and snap names popped up instead with an offer to secure the domain in an auction. I thought I would be interested in that so I placed a bid and secured the domain several weeks later.

When snapnames advised me that the requirements were finished they refered me to the entity that will set up the web site. When I went to the site and entered the password, it would not allow me to log in. I waited severla days and like wise I could not log in. 

I called the 415 area code number listeed and you&#039;ll never guess the call patched through to India with a person who I could not understand nor she me?
Frustrated I called again and exactly the same experience. In the mean time I obtained no less than 7 pass words and none would get me past the error user not registered phase.

When I called snapnames in Portland i spoke with a very nice and patient person and explained that I was not satisfied and wanted to cancel the purchase and she had a tech by the name of Roger get on the line asking me if I needed tech support?When I said no he hung up?!!

Calling back I asked for an explanation and he said well you said you didnt want help so i hung up?
I snet them two emails and they say they arnet formated correctly and that the emails were attched?
What the heck kind of nonsense is this?
When we as consumers bid and obtain a domain and are sent to the next step only to wind up over seas dealing with persons who refer you back to snapnames who says all sales are final?

Well all sales are not final all sales using a credit card are subject to review by the card company and the actions of snapnames are subject to a review of the consumers affairs beaureau of Oregon or the city of Portland?

And finally the court of consumer opinion.

If snapnames wnats to dump consumers to overseas entities who cannot communicate effectively and are impotent to resolve the issue of not being able to log on, then who needs snapnames?
I want to unite this deal and will see to it that it will be untied.

Stewart
venice, California
U.S.A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ripoffreport.com-July 24 2006</p>
<p>Report: Snapnames.com<br />
Category: Internet Services</p>
<p>Snapnames.com ripoff Portland Oregon<br />
*UPDATE by author&#8230; </p>
<p>Snapnames.com<br />
Phone:  800-385 4075<br />
Fax:  503-274 9749 115 NW 1st Ave, Suite 300<br />
Portland, Oregon 97209<br />
U.S.A.</p>
<p>Submitted: Monday, July 24, 2006<br />
Last posting: Friday, November 06, 2009<br />
venice, California</p>
<p>Snapnames.com is a company that registers internet domain nmaes. In this example when I searched for a business their domain name had expired and snap names popped up instead with an offer to secure the domain in an auction. I thought I would be interested in that so I placed a bid and secured the domain several weeks later.</p>
<p>When snapnames advised me that the requirements were finished they refered me to the entity that will set up the web site. When I went to the site and entered the password, it would not allow me to log in. I waited severla days and like wise I could not log in. </p>
<p>I called the 415 area code number listeed and you&#8217;ll never guess the call patched through to India with a person who I could not understand nor she me?<br />
Frustrated I called again and exactly the same experience. In the mean time I obtained no less than 7 pass words and none would get me past the error user not registered phase.</p>
<p>When I called snapnames in Portland i spoke with a very nice and patient person and explained that I was not satisfied and wanted to cancel the purchase and she had a tech by the name of Roger get on the line asking me if I needed tech support?When I said no he hung up?!!</p>
<p>Calling back I asked for an explanation and he said well you said you didnt want help so i hung up?<br />
I snet them two emails and they say they arnet formated correctly and that the emails were attched?<br />
What the heck kind of nonsense is this?<br />
When we as consumers bid and obtain a domain and are sent to the next step only to wind up over seas dealing with persons who refer you back to snapnames who says all sales are final?</p>
<p>Well all sales are not final all sales using a credit card are subject to review by the card company and the actions of snapnames are subject to a review of the consumers affairs beaureau of Oregon or the city of Portland?</p>
<p>And finally the court of consumer opinion.</p>
<p>If snapnames wnats to dump consumers to overseas entities who cannot communicate effectively and are impotent to resolve the issue of not being able to log on, then who needs snapnames?<br />
I want to unite this deal and will see to it that it will be untied.</p>
<p>Stewart<br />
venice, California<br />
U.S.A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pitbullstew</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/comment-page-1#comment-70199</link>
		<dc:creator>pitbullstew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6491#comment-70199</guid>
		<description>oh? I get it now? 
Because I am one of the people who complained about something being worng at snapnames its now me that was the problem then and now?
Is that what you are saying? 
That our circle of crest fallen cohorts are most used?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh? I get it now?<br />
Because I am one of the people who complained about something being worng at snapnames its now me that was the problem then and now?<br />
Is that what you are saying?<br />
That our circle of crest fallen cohorts are most used?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domo</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/comment-page-1#comment-70169</link>
		<dc:creator>Domo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6491#comment-70169</guid>
		<description>In the one hand we need some type of a Coop (I beleive J Berryhill suggested ed afew years back) , in the other hand it will be like organizing snakes , spiders, worms, scorpions and crickets into peaceful co-existence , at times where TM abuses are applauded ,aided and abated  in some domain prominent forums.

&quot;something ought to change...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the one hand we need some type of a Coop (I beleive J Berryhill suggested ed afew years back) , in the other hand it will be like organizing snakes , spiders, worms, scorpions and crickets into peaceful co-existence , at times where TM abuses are applauded ,aided and abated  in some domain prominent forums.</p>
<p>&#8220;something ought to change&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SnapNames Shill Bidding Followup &#8211; There Is More To It Than Meets The Eye &#124; Domain Name News &#124; Domain News &#124; Expired Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/comment-page-1#comment-70049</link>
		<dc:creator>SnapNames Shill Bidding Followup &#8211; There Is More To It Than Meets The Eye &#124; Domain Name News &#124; Domain News &#124; Expired Domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6491#comment-70049</guid>
		<description>[...] Strong has followed up on the story in great detail in a must read expose over at DNN, while even Michael Arrington of TechCrunch chose to give his views on the matter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Strong has followed up on the story in great detail in a must read expose over at DNN, while even Michael Arrington of TechCrunch chose to give his views on the matter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu Maloff</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/snapnames-insider-bidding-aftermath-editorial/6491/comment-page-1#comment-70022</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Maloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6491#comment-70022</guid>
		<description>It seemed that Halvarez is in just about every auction I was involved in. He did not always win the auctions. I think he bid on so many at a time, he was unable to keep up.
As per the previous email, I won hundreds of names on Snap Names. The registration info is all there, but they seemed to have deleted most of my bidding history and only have a couple left with Halvarez involved. 
They should not people handling the investigation from within.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seemed that Halvarez is in just about every auction I was involved in. He did not always win the auctions. I think he bid on so many at a time, he was unable to keep up.<br />
As per the previous email, I won hundreds of names on Snap Names. The registration info is all there, but they seemed to have deleted most of my bidding history and only have a couple left with Halvarez involved.<br />
They should not people handling the investigation from within.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

