<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rise of ‘Brandable Generics’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/the-rise-of-%e2%80%98brandable-generics%e2%80%99/1645/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/the-rise-of-%e2%80%98brandable-generics%e2%80%99/1645</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/the-rise-of-%e2%80%98brandable-generics%e2%80%99/1645/comment-page-1#comment-42839</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1645#comment-42839</guid>
		<description>Very well put.  A great read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well put.  A great read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/the-rise-of-%e2%80%98brandable-generics%e2%80%99/1645/comment-page-1#comment-42804</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1645#comment-42804</guid>
		<description>Great article. Very detailed and representative of overall traditional aspects of domain evaluations.  However, at a happy hour party with a large group of SEM and domainers in Portland, OR, we debated the determination of which was more valuable in a domain choice, singular or plural. While a lot depends on the domain name itself, overall, many domainers look at the singular first. However, the SEM experts said the plurals were more valuable. I agreed on some points, but is that the way it works in a domain auction?  My experience told me that the singular usually was more valuable. I&#039;m reconsidering that position now.

We thought of two domains:  Table.com and Tables.com

We quickly chose the plural of this domain as being more valuable (not by a significant $$ amount). The one basic reason we agreed on was that &quot;Tables.com&quot; seemed like a better brand for a build out -- or a co-branding marketing asset. However, if you take the domain &quot;baby.com&quot; and compare it to &quot;babies.com&quot;, the singular easily beats the plural. The proof is in the Johnson &amp; Johnson pudding.

There are so many variables to domain name values it&#039;s very hard to really determine how &quot;high&quot; a domain value can go. What you can find out, though, is where its &quot;ground floor value&quot; is.  Find out that appraisal amount, and you don&#039;t want to have a buyer dig below your &quot;ground floor value&quot; and &quot;collapse&quot; the minimum value of your domain. 

These types of articles you are posting are extremely valuable to domain investors and the business/marketing sector. Keep it up!

Stephen Douglas
Successclick.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Very detailed and representative of overall traditional aspects of domain evaluations.  However, at a happy hour party with a large group of SEM and domainers in Portland, OR, we debated the determination of which was more valuable in a domain choice, singular or plural. While a lot depends on the domain name itself, overall, many domainers look at the singular first. However, the SEM experts said the plurals were more valuable. I agreed on some points, but is that the way it works in a domain auction?  My experience told me that the singular usually was more valuable. I&#8217;m reconsidering that position now.</p>
<p>We thought of two domains:  Table.com and Tables.com</p>
<p>We quickly chose the plural of this domain as being more valuable (not by a significant $$ amount). The one basic reason we agreed on was that &#8220;Tables.com&#8221; seemed like a better brand for a build out &#8212; or a co-branding marketing asset. However, if you take the domain &#8220;baby.com&#8221; and compare it to &#8220;babies.com&#8221;, the singular easily beats the plural. The proof is in the Johnson &amp; Johnson pudding.</p>
<p>There are so many variables to domain name values it&#8217;s very hard to really determine how &#8220;high&#8221; a domain value can go. What you can find out, though, is where its &#8220;ground floor value&#8221; is.  Find out that appraisal amount, and you don&#8217;t want to have a buyer dig below your &#8220;ground floor value&#8221; and &#8220;collapse&#8221; the minimum value of your domain. </p>
<p>These types of articles you are posting are extremely valuable to domain investors and the business/marketing sector. Keep it up!</p>
<p>Stephen Douglas<br />
Successclick.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoinette</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/the-rise-of-%e2%80%98brandable-generics%e2%80%99/1645/comment-page-1#comment-42469</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoinette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1645#comment-42469</guid>
		<description>I got a lot out of this article although I&#039;m still not sure I know the exact difference between a premium generic and a brandable generic domain name. The 6 factors help but some could be applied to premium generic domains as well.

A lot of the domain name industry terms are pretty fuzzy and it&#039;s assumed everyone agrees on a definition when it is actually difficult to pin one down.

And I think it is &quot;lay&quot; not &quot;lies&quot;...but I could be wrong (paging my fourth grade English teacher...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a lot out of this article although I&#8217;m still not sure I know the exact difference between a premium generic and a brandable generic domain name. The 6 factors help but some could be applied to premium generic domains as well.</p>
<p>A lot of the domain name industry terms are pretty fuzzy and it&#8217;s assumed everyone agrees on a definition when it is actually difficult to pin one down.</p>
<p>And I think it is &#8220;lay&#8221; not &#8220;lies&#8221;&#8230;but I could be wrong (paging my fourth grade English teacher&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Prosser</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/the-rise-of-%e2%80%98brandable-generics%e2%80%99/1645/comment-page-1#comment-42453</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Prosser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1645#comment-42453</guid>
		<description>Well put.  Again, another great resource to reference and use when considering buying or  selling property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put.  Again, another great resource to reference and use when considering buying or  selling property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Castello</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/the-rise-of-%e2%80%98brandable-generics%e2%80%99/1645/comment-page-1#comment-42445</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1645#comment-42445</guid>
		<description>Excellent article from someone that sees the BIG picture. Use his points and be ahead of the game. There is information in this piece that I have used since 1994 but is not easy to communicate to others. M.Fiol articulates it very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article from someone that sees the BIG picture. Use his points and be ahead of the game. There is information in this piece that I have used since 1994 but is not easy to communicate to others. M.Fiol articulates it very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/the-rise-of-%e2%80%98brandable-generics%e2%80%99/1645/comment-page-1#comment-42438</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1645#comment-42438</guid>
		<description>Excellent article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

