<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Class Action Suit Against Network Solutions and ICANN Underway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Holloway</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450/comment-page-1#comment-58524</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Holloway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450#comment-58524</guid>
		<description>This company has sold me a Domain Name that already existed. Perhaps some of it is my fault. I should have typed in that Web Address to see what happened but I did not. 

I entered the domain name in their box and selected the checkbox and then entered submit. It said it was available. I do not like the idea at all that they reserve a name and then I as the user have to buy it form them for a much more expensive price.

I called them and told them that the damn Domain Name that they sold me is taken and they gave me a bunch of bull. THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS: THE DOMAIN NAME WHEN TYPED INTO A BROWSER DISPLAYS ANOTHER COMPANY. NOT MINE. 

WHAT CAN I DO ABOU THIS ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This company has sold me a Domain Name that already existed. Perhaps some of it is my fault. I should have typed in that Web Address to see what happened but I did not. </p>
<p>I entered the domain name in their box and selected the checkbox and then entered submit. It said it was available. I do not like the idea at all that they reserve a name and then I as the user have to buy it form them for a much more expensive price.</p>
<p>I called them and told them that the damn Domain Name that they sold me is taken and they gave me a bunch of bull. THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS: THE DOMAIN NAME WHEN TYPED INTO A BROWSER DISPLAYS ANOTHER COMPANY. NOT MINE. </p>
<p>WHAT CAN I DO ABOU THIS ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Man</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450/comment-page-1#comment-55105</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450#comment-55105</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t sound dramatic to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t sound dramatic to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOWN WITH DAVE</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450/comment-page-1#comment-38076</link>
		<dc:creator>DOWN WITH DAVE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450#comment-38076</guid>
		<description>JUST wanted to let everybody know that DAVE ZAN works for Network Solutions and you can read all of his &quot;PRO-NETSOL&quot; rhetoric on any of the blog posts..... see for yourself
http://paul.stadig.name/2008/01/22/network-solutions-steals-your-domain-names/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JUST wanted to let everybody know that DAVE ZAN works for Network Solutions and you can read all of his &#8220;PRO-NETSOL&#8221; rhetoric on any of the blog posts&#8230;.. see for yourself<br />
<a href="http://paul.stadig.name/2008/01/22/network-solutions-steals-your-domain-names/" rel="nofollow">http://paul.stadig.name/2008/01/22/network-solutions-steals-your-domain-names/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWW.CollisionDomains.com</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450/comment-page-1#comment-30842</link>
		<dc:creator>WWW.CollisionDomains.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 05:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450#comment-30842</guid>
		<description>I feel Network solutions has to pay a settlement for this case. from the past history of lawsuit firm, it shows that it won cases filed for its clients and won more than $750 million against Google, Yahoo!,
Farmer&#039;s Insurance, Eli Lilly and others. to them &quot; NSI&quot; is nothing But it will create a world renowned bad reputation in history. Each and every domainer become aware about this silly activity of NSI &amp; ICANN . Other registrars will be very serious to keep up their business + reputation.

It is a foolish thing for ICANN &quot; social firm paid to maintain domain records &quot; to support such an illegal activity.

For NSI - already a fraud no problem. But it is a major bad name for ICANN in world history for supporting illegal domain scams.

i feel all are making scams, recently verisign sells its partial root name server data for huge cash on regular basis. may be ICANN also do it as it owns one root name server among 13.

Best Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel Network solutions has to pay a settlement for this case. from the past history of lawsuit firm, it shows that it won cases filed for its clients and won more than $750 million against Google, Yahoo!,<br />
Farmer&#8217;s Insurance, Eli Lilly and others. to them &#8221; NSI&#8221; is nothing But it will create a world renowned bad reputation in history. Each and every domainer become aware about this silly activity of NSI &amp; ICANN . Other registrars will be very serious to keep up their business + reputation.</p>
<p>It is a foolish thing for ICANN &#8221; social firm paid to maintain domain records &#8221; to support such an illegal activity.</p>
<p>For NSI &#8211; already a fraud no problem. But it is a major bad name for ICANN in world history for supporting illegal domain scams.</p>
<p>i feel all are making scams, recently verisign sells its partial root name server data for huge cash on regular basis. may be ICANN also do it as it owns one root name server among 13.</p>
<p>Best Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyop</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450/comment-page-1#comment-25294</link>
		<dc:creator>tyop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450#comment-25294</guid>
		<description>I did some graphic design work for NSI sometime around &#039;97-98.  It was just a fairly small building not far from Boston, their servers didn&#039;t take up much more than one wall in a little 20&#039; x 20&#039; clean room.  I don&#039;t know what level of &#039;clean&#039; they were trying to maintain (I&#039;m more of an artist than a nerd) but I feel such a sense of loss or a missed opportunity when I think about how the cup of tea in my hand could have changed the internet as we know it today.

&quot;Oops, I slipped!  :( Sorry, I didn&#039;t mean to short circuit your server thingy.&quot;

With the way I was dressed that first day, I probably could have gotten away with just about anything.  For once I&#039;m actually glad I didn&#039;t know then what I know now, this lawsuit is going to be too funny to miss :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some graphic design work for NSI sometime around &#8217;97-98.  It was just a fairly small building not far from Boston, their servers didn&#8217;t take up much more than one wall in a little 20&#8242; x 20&#8242; clean room.  I don&#8217;t know what level of &#8216;clean&#8217; they were trying to maintain (I&#8217;m more of an artist than a nerd) but I feel such a sense of loss or a missed opportunity when I think about how the cup of tea in my hand could have changed the internet as we know it today.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oops, I slipped!  :( Sorry, I didn&#8217;t mean to short circuit your server thingy.&#8221;</p>
<p>With the way I was dressed that first day, I probably could have gotten away with just about anything.  For once I&#8217;m actually glad I didn&#8217;t know then what I know now, this lawsuit is going to be too funny to miss :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zan</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450/comment-page-1#comment-25064</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450#comment-25064</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ll be very interested in seeing how this lawsuit unfolds. I bet they settle rather than change their policies. It would be more profitable to them to give payouts to the few people who would participate in a class action suit than change a policy that daily earns them a great deal of money.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Won&#039;t be surprising if Network Solutions chooses to settle. However, it won&#039;t be surprising either if they choose to fight it out, and they&#039;re not exactly a total stranger to legal suits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ll be very interested in seeing how this lawsuit unfolds. I bet they settle rather than change their policies. It would be more profitable to them to give payouts to the few people who would participate in a class action suit than change a policy that daily earns them a great deal of money.</p></blockquote>
<p>Won&#8217;t be surprising if Network Solutions chooses to settle. However, it won&#8217;t be surprising either if they choose to fight it out, and they&#8217;re not exactly a total stranger to legal suits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoinette</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450/comment-page-1#comment-25042</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoinette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450#comment-25042</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be very interested in seeing how this lawsuit unfolds. I bet they settle rather than change their policies. It would be more profitable to them to give payouts to the few people who would participate in a class action suit than change a policy that daily earns them a great deal of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be very interested in seeing how this lawsuit unfolds. I bet they settle rather than change their policies. It would be more profitable to them to give payouts to the few people who would participate in a class action suit than change a policy that daily earns them a great deal of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450/comment-page-1#comment-25024</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/class-action-suit-against-network-solutions-and-icann-underway/1450#comment-25024</guid>
		<description>Nasty little kick in the pants for your $14.99 domain registration--I charge you more for the pleasure of competing with my customers!

These practices are only going to get nastier and more litigious as domains become more accepted as monetary assets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nasty little kick in the pants for your $14.99 domain registration&#8211;I charge you more for the pleasure of competing with my customers!</p>
<p>These practices are only going to get nastier and more litigious as domains become more accepted as monetary assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

