<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Registrar Sued Because of Cybersquatter Using Whois Privacy Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/namecheap-sued-domain-whois-privacy-service/5198/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/namecheap-sued-domain-whois-privacy-service/5198</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My own &#34;WHOIS Guard&#34; - NamePros.com</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/namecheap-sued-domain-whois-privacy-service/5198/comment-page-1#comment-65071</link>
		<dc:creator>My own &#34;WHOIS Guard&#34; - NamePros.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5198#comment-65071</guid>
		<description>[...] on its legality that would be appreciated    Just to give an idea of what legal issue to expect:  Registrar Sued Because of Cybersquatter Using Whois Privacy Service &#124; Domain Name News  You need not necessarily worry, though.   __________________ Vidi, Vici, Veni!  Follow Me On [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on its legality that would be appreciated    Just to give an idea of what legal issue to expect:  Registrar Sued Because of Cybersquatter Using Whois Privacy Service | Domain Name News  You need not necessarily worry, though.   __________________ Vidi, Vici, Veni!  Follow Me On [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/namecheap-sued-domain-whois-privacy-service/5198/comment-page-1#comment-65018</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5198#comment-65018</guid>
		<description>Thanks Richard. I expect you to fight the case vehemently and win. There seems to be too many problems with this case.  The most ridiculous being why the company is suing you but not the person who stole the domain.  I hope that we shed some light on some of these issues in the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Richard. I expect you to fight the case vehemently and win. There seems to be too many problems with this case.  The most ridiculous being why the company is suing you but not the person who stole the domain.  I hope that we shed some light on some of these issues in the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichardK</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/namecheap-sued-domain-whois-privacy-service/5198/comment-page-1#comment-65011</link>
		<dc:creator>RichardK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 08:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=5198#comment-65011</guid>
		<description>You need to be reminded that this was simply a motion to dismiss which 
requires pretty much no evidence to be presented and by nature leans towards 
the plaintiff&#039;s right to argue their case in a court of law. I&#039;m quite 
confident that once we get this into a regular trial and evidence is 
presented that we will have a successful outcome. There were many 
contradictory arguments in this ruling and many possible open doors left to 
attack this by. In other words, nothing has been decided yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to be reminded that this was simply a motion to dismiss which<br />
requires pretty much no evidence to be presented and by nature leans towards<br />
the plaintiff&#8217;s right to argue their case in a court of law. I&#8217;m quite<br />
confident that once we get this into a regular trial and evidence is<br />
presented that we will have a successful outcome. There were many<br />
contradictory arguments in this ruling and many possible open doors left to<br />
attack this by. In other words, nothing has been decided yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

