<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wales to Apply for New TLD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/icann-policy/wales-to-apply-for-new-tld/1961/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/icann-policy/wales-to-apply-for-new-tld/1961</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: (unts</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/icann-policy/wales-to-apply-for-new-tld/1961/comment-page-1#comment-80124</link>
		<dc:creator>(unts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1961#comment-80124</guid>
		<description>how about a .cunt or a .shit. We can have one of those.  Must be a bunch of retards governing the ICANN and TLD rules now.  This completely defeats standardisation processes and allows for duplication. What next, we will have TLDs with unicode extensions so that foreign characters can be entered for TLDs.  Cunts.

We would start seeing &quot;microsoft.cunt&quot; or &quot;apple.cunt&quot;, &quot;us.mil.cunt&quot; anything you can think of.  Not having a reasonably guessable hostname makes double-ups very difficult and confusing for everyone.  

I see lawsuits pending.  They better get their appropriate laws and shit sorted otherwise they will be a full-time consultation committee for trials and companies suing cunts for similar names, etc.

Cunts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about a .cunt or a .shit. We can have one of those.  Must be a bunch of retards governing the ICANN and TLD rules now.  This completely defeats standardisation processes and allows for duplication. What next, we will have TLDs with unicode extensions so that foreign characters can be entered for TLDs.  Cunts.</p>
<p>We would start seeing &#8220;microsoft.cunt&#8221; or &#8220;apple.cunt&#8221;, &#8220;us.mil.cunt&#8221; anything you can think of.  Not having a reasonably guessable hostname makes double-ups very difficult and confusing for everyone.  </p>
<p>I see lawsuits pending.  They better get their appropriate laws and shit sorted otherwise they will be a full-time consultation committee for trials and companies suing cunts for similar names, etc.</p>
<p>Cunts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Dervy</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/icann-policy/wales-to-apply-for-new-tld/1961/comment-page-1#comment-47097</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Dervy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1961#comment-47097</guid>
		<description>Well, .cym is sounds good. I think that more top-level domains are good for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, .cym is sounds good. I think that more top-level domains are good for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/icann-policy/wales-to-apply-for-new-tld/1961/comment-page-1#comment-47086</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1961#comment-47086</guid>
		<description>This new TLD thing is rediculous. Any company that thinks they can use the TLD without owning the equivalent .com will result in traffic leakage.

Internet users are going to get so confused with this change in rules to allow such names. What a mess the governing bodys have allowed in the roll out of the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new TLD thing is rediculous. Any company that thinks they can use the TLD without owning the equivalent .com will result in traffic leakage.</p>
<p>Internet users are going to get so confused with this change in rules to allow such names. What a mess the governing bodys have allowed in the roll out of the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/icann-policy/wales-to-apply-for-new-tld/1961/comment-page-1#comment-47085</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1961#comment-47085</guid>
		<description>Given how close .cym is with .com, it seems like a risky extension to try to get approved by ICANN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given how close .cym is with .com, it seems like a risky extension to try to get approved by ICANN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

