<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SnapNames to Bring Back Historical Bid Information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/snapnames-bring-historical-bid-information/6513/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/snapnames-bring-historical-bid-information/6513</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Snapnames &#8220;Rebate&#8221; Offer Poll &#124; Domain Name News</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/snapnames-bring-historical-bid-information/6513/comment-page-1#comment-70278</link>
		<dc:creator>Snapnames &#8220;Rebate&#8221; Offer Poll &#124; Domain Name News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6513#comment-70278</guid>
		<description>[...] has issued rebate offers and has re-published all auction bidding history to the user&#8217;s accounts, we would like to know what you are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has issued rebate offers and has re-published all auction bidding history to the user&#8217;s accounts, we would like to know what you are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arrington: Apologies Shouldn’t be Conditional &#124; Domaining Manual</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/snapnames-bring-historical-bid-information/6513/comment-page-1#comment-70262</link>
		<dc:creator>Arrington: Apologies Shouldn’t be Conditional &#124; Domaining Manual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6513#comment-70262</guid>
		<description>[...] should re-enable it. I&#8217;ve sent them a note asking for their position on it. [Update: I missed this post on DNN, which links to a forum post in which SnapNames does say it will bring back the entire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should re-enable it. I&#8217;ve sent them a note asking for their position on it. [Update: I missed this post on DNN, which links to a forum post in which SnapNames does say it will bring back the entire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Arrington: Apologies Shouldn&#8217;t be Conditional - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/snapnames-bring-historical-bid-information/6513/comment-page-1#comment-70257</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Arrington: Apologies Shouldn&#8217;t be Conditional - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6513#comment-70257</guid>
		<description>[...] should re-enable it. I&#8217;ve sent them a note asking for their position on it. [Update: I missed this post on DNN, which links to a forum post in which SnapNames does say it will bring back the entire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should re-enable it. I&#8217;ve sent them a note asking for their position on it. [Update: I missed this post on DNN, which links to a forum post in which SnapNames does say it will bring back the entire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soundly Reasoned</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/snapnames-bring-historical-bid-information/6513/comment-page-1#comment-70239</link>
		<dc:creator>Soundly Reasoned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6513#comment-70239</guid>
		<description>&quot;The truncated system, which limits view to the 24 months prior to whatever date the lookup is being performed, has been in place for the past four years, since June 2005.&quot; Snapnames

This truncating did not occur until sometime in mid to late 2009. That is an deception and misdirection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The truncated system, which limits view to the 24 months prior to whatever date the lookup is being performed, has been in place for the past four years, since June 2005.&#8221; Snapnames</p>
<p>This truncating did not occur until sometime in mid to late 2009. That is an deception and misdirection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/snapnames-bring-historical-bid-information/6513/comment-page-1#comment-70222</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6513#comment-70222</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by dnnews: SnapNames to Bring Back Historical Bid Information - http://tinyurl.com/yfbleca...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by dnnews: SnapNames to Bring Back Historical Bid Information &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfbleca.." rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yfbleca..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
