Subscribe to RSS Feed

11|07|2009 10:44 pm EDT

Snapnames “Rebate” Offer Poll

by Frank Michlick in Categories: Legal Issues

SnapNames has issued rebate offers and has re-published all auction bidding history to the user’s accounts, we would like to know what you are considering:

Will you accept the Snapnames "rebate" offer?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

How much money were you offered?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Tags:

11 Comments

[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by DomainNameNews, DomainNameNews. DomainNameNews said: #domains: Snapnames "Rebate" Offer Poll http://bit.ly/4zF3S0 […]

uberVU - social comments

November 7, 2009 @ 11:19 pm EDT

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by domainnamenews: #domains: Snapnames “Rebate” Offer Poll http://bit.ly/4zF3S0

Paul Keating

November 8, 2009 @ 6:30 am EDT

I really believe people should put this behind them. I do not represent Snap. I say this because:

1. The class action route will ONLY make the attorneys wealthy. After the attorneys fees are paid the plaintiffs will no doubt be left with a free coupon worth $10.

2. MORE IMPORTANTLY, is that if we do not allow Snap to do the right thing here without vultures circling, others with similar problems will not act responsibly in the future.

pitbullstew

November 8, 2009 @ 6:31 am EDT

I will wait for the Oregon AG to review my comlaint, there is more at stake here than my ‘rebate’.
These folks trying to get out front of this to avoid criminal liabilty is a pretty slick manuever, let the chips fall where they may.

[…] Update: 11/09/09: There is a poll that has been set up by Domain Name News regarding the Snapnames Rebate Offer. If you have a chance, please take the poll. […]

Smith

November 9, 2009 @ 3:51 pm EDT

Interesting that 6 people claim to be getting back more money than Frank Shilling.

Drew

November 9, 2009 @ 9:27 pm EDT

>Interesting that 6 people claim to be getting back more money than Frank Shilling.

I think he mainly targeted domains with only one bidder in them, and knowing their proxy bid, bumped them up closer to it.

Most of the names FS would go for would be ones a LOT of people would go for, so there would be no need for halvarez to artificially fiddle the market.

ActNow

November 10, 2009 @ 8:44 am EDT

“Interesting that 6 people claim to be getting back more money than Frank Shilling.”

I must have missed it. I don’t recall seeing Frank’s settlement number.

ActNow

November 10, 2009 @ 10:01 am EDT

Frank, you are correct.
I forgot.
Thanks for the update.

Cartoonz

November 10, 2009 @ 2:59 pm EDT

“Most of the names FS would go for would be ones a LOT of people would go for, so there would be no need for halvarez to artificially fiddle the market.”

untrue.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply