<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whois Privacy Is &#8216;Material Falsification&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/whois-privacy-material-falsification/6474/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/whois-privacy-material-falsification/6474</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: United States v. Kilbride: Domain Registration Privacy Services Are 'Material Falsification' &#124; UsefulArts.us</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/whois-privacy-material-falsification/6474/comment-page-1#comment-70439</link>
		<dc:creator>United States v. Kilbride: Domain Registration Privacy Services Are 'Material Falsification' &#124; UsefulArts.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6474#comment-70439</guid>
		<description>[...] Now the Ninth Circuit court of appeals has said that using such a service constitutes a  &#8220;material falsification&#8221; of information.&#8221; See United States v. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now the Ninth Circuit court of appeals has said that using such a service constitutes a  &#8220;material falsification&#8221; of information.&#8221; See United States v. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Keating</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/whois-privacy-material-falsification/6474/comment-page-1#comment-70062</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Keating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6474#comment-70062</guid>
		<description>Adam, as you know from the note I sent you yesterday, this ONLY applies to CAN SPAM actions.  It does NOT apply to ACPA claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, as you know from the note I sent you yesterday, this ONLY applies to CAN SPAM actions.  It does NOT apply to ACPA claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/whois-privacy-material-falsification/6474/comment-page-1#comment-70050</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6474#comment-70050</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by domainnamenews: #domains: Whois Privacy Is &#039;Material Falsification&#039; http://bit.ly/2SQPr1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by domainnamenews: #domains: Whois Privacy Is &#8216;Material Falsification&#8217; <a href="http://bit.ly/2SQPr1.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2SQPr1..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If WHOIS PRIVACY is &#8220;material falsification&#8221;, then does that mean that by removing your name and number from the telephone book is ILLEGAL? &#171; Domain Bloggers - DOMAIN NAME DISCUSSIONS - DOMAIN NAME BLOG</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/whois-privacy-material-falsification/6474/comment-page-1#comment-69953</link>
		<dc:creator>If WHOIS PRIVACY is &#8220;material falsification&#8221;, then does that mean that by removing your name and number from the telephone book is ILLEGAL? &#171; Domain Bloggers - DOMAIN NAME DISCUSSIONS - DOMAIN NAME BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6474#comment-69953</guid>
		<description>[...] Whois Privacy Is ‘Material Falsification’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Whois Privacy Is ‘Material Falsification’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Whois Privacy Is ‘Material Falsification’ &#124; Domain Name News -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/whois-privacy-material-falsification/6474/comment-page-1#comment-69946</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Whois Privacy Is ‘Material Falsification’ &#124; Domain Name News -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=6474#comment-69946</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jacek Slominski, DomainNameNews. DomainNameNews said: #domains: Whois Privacy Is &#039;Material Falsification&#039; http://bit.ly/2SQPr1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jacek Slominski, DomainNameNews. DomainNameNews said: #domains: Whois Privacy Is &#39;Material Falsification&#39; <a href="http://bit.ly/2SQPr1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2SQPr1</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

