<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReplyCycle Taps Into New Revenue Source For Domain Name Owners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph davidovic</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/comment-page-1#comment-48715</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph davidovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2156#comment-48715</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting idea and time will tell if the uptake is sufficient to create a viable revenue stream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting idea and time will tell if the uptake is sufficient to create a viable revenue stream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Michlick</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/comment-page-1#comment-48607</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Michlick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2156#comment-48607</guid>
		<description>Great idea guys and congratulations on the launch. In a large scale, this idea may just fly. Hopefully the servers can handle the amount of mail.

This is a logical extension of the thinking parked.com has been applying to expired domains by showing &quot;click here&quot; imagines whenever a web browser requests an image from their parked domains, or even RSS feeds with links back to the site for expired domains. I have yet to see a catch-all flash file on parked domains though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea guys and congratulations on the launch. In a large scale, this idea may just fly. Hopefully the servers can handle the amount of mail.</p>
<p>This is a logical extension of the thinking parked.com has been applying to expired domains by showing &#8220;click here&#8221; imagines whenever a web browser requests an image from their parked domains, or even RSS feeds with links back to the site for expired domains. I have yet to see a catch-all flash file on parked domains though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwayne Rowland</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/comment-page-1#comment-48513</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwayne Rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2156#comment-48513</guid>
		<description>I think this will fly. Simply replace the spam message with a better spam message and forward to the spoofed email address. If done using a responsible message which includes the orginal header ip address for tracing to a source, it&#039;ll work. Otherwise it&#039;s just another source of spamming addresses and your domain will be tagged an open relay. I&#039;ve tested this concept with emaillandfill.com and it was very interesting to go thru trash emails and reply to the spoofed senders. One way to make this work for sure is to offer a way to never receive another spam email addressed to the domain. You would not have to ever worry about running out of addresses for spammers send out millions on a hourly basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this will fly. Simply replace the spam message with a better spam message and forward to the spoofed email address. If done using a responsible message which includes the orginal header ip address for tracing to a source, it&#8217;ll work. Otherwise it&#8217;s just another source of spamming addresses and your domain will be tagged an open relay. I&#8217;ve tested this concept with emaillandfill.com and it was very interesting to go thru trash emails and reply to the spoofed senders. One way to make this work for sure is to offer a way to never receive another spam email addressed to the domain. You would not have to ever worry about running out of addresses for spammers send out millions on a hourly basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/comment-page-1#comment-48466</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2156#comment-48466</guid>
		<description>:-)

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  invalid-email-address-test@replycycle.com
    SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO::
    host replycycle.com [72.55.174.165]: 550 No Such User Here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:-)</p>
<p>This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.</p>
<p>A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its<br />
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:</p>
<p>  <a href="mailto:invalid-email-address-test@replycycle.com">invalid-email-address-test@replycycle.com</a><br />
    SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO::<br />
    host replycycle.com [72.55.174.165]: 550 No Such User Here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/comment-page-1#comment-48465</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2156#comment-48465</guid>
		<description>What A Great Idea!

So all a spammer has to do is find domains that are parked and send all kinds of spam to any fake address at the parked domain with a reply address of those they want to send spam to. Or harass. The messages bounce back to all of us, now carrying the additional ads on top of the orginal spam...!

I suggest that anyone considering this first set up a &quot;Catchall&quot; email address on one or more of their domains (I have in the past) and see for themselves what kind of god-awlful junk pours in...

On the other hand, the idea of most large corporate sites like Verizon &quot;caring&quot; if you send them email or not is laughable. It seems like everytime I try to find contact email addresses on the sites of large companies it&#039;s just about impossible! I often have to hunt just to find a contact form...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What A Great Idea!</p>
<p>So all a spammer has to do is find domains that are parked and send all kinds of spam to any fake address at the parked domain with a reply address of those they want to send spam to. Or harass. The messages bounce back to all of us, now carrying the additional ads on top of the orginal spam&#8230;!</p>
<p>I suggest that anyone considering this first set up a &#8220;Catchall&#8221; email address on one or more of their domains (I have in the past) and see for themselves what kind of god-awlful junk pours in&#8230;</p>
<p>On the other hand, the idea of most large corporate sites like Verizon &#8220;caring&#8221; if you send them email or not is laughable. It seems like everytime I try to find contact email addresses on the sites of large companies it&#8217;s just about impossible! I often have to hunt just to find a contact form&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wegrzyn</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/comment-page-1#comment-48464</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wegrzyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2156#comment-48464</guid>
		<description>I actually thought of this idea some time ago as well, but never really saw enough value to work on it. So I think that ReplyCycle is an interesting project and has potential, but I don&#039;t think it will work the way they are proposing it.

They want to add in CPA offers. I think I kind of know the reason. I think, and I don&#039;t know the truth behind this so this is only my opinion...but I think that they want to send out CPA offers in bounce back emails, this would only work for types of large businesses such as Target or Amazon that have affiliate programs. If the visitor were to click on the CPA offer, it would set a cookie on the user&#039;s computer for 30-45 days. The user doesn&#039;t have to buy something right then and there. If he/she returns within 30-45 days and buys something at these big sites and still has the cookie on his/her pc, then the ReplyCycle company gets credited commission for the affiliate referral, which is passed on to the domain parking company / domain owner.

That&#039;s the only way I can really think that this will work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually thought of this idea some time ago as well, but never really saw enough value to work on it. So I think that ReplyCycle is an interesting project and has potential, but I don&#8217;t think it will work the way they are proposing it.</p>
<p>They want to add in CPA offers. I think I kind of know the reason. I think, and I don&#8217;t know the truth behind this so this is only my opinion&#8230;but I think that they want to send out CPA offers in bounce back emails, this would only work for types of large businesses such as Target or Amazon that have affiliate programs. If the visitor were to click on the CPA offer, it would set a cookie on the user&#8217;s computer for 30-45 days. The user doesn&#8217;t have to buy something right then and there. If he/she returns within 30-45 days and buys something at these big sites and still has the cookie on his/her pc, then the ReplyCycle company gets credited commission for the affiliate referral, which is passed on to the domain parking company / domain owner.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the only way I can really think that this will work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/comment-page-1#comment-48438</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2156#comment-48438</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are right but even in the hosting world I don&#039;t think anyone has yet to consider using the bounce back email as a revenue source. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s ever been considered, although I&#039;ve seen more than a few &quot;I thought of that ideas&quot; floating around on the forums already in regard to replycycle.

I think in general customers (if they are domain owners) are interested in making more money atm. . . . No poll necessary :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are right but even in the hosting world I don&#8217;t think anyone has yet to consider using the bounce back email as a revenue source. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s ever been considered, although I&#8217;ve seen more than a few &#8220;I thought of that ideas&#8221; floating around on the forums already in regard to replycycle.</p>
<p>I think in general customers (if they are domain owners) are interested in making more money atm. . . . No poll necessary :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too Many Secrets</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/comment-page-1#comment-48431</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Many Secrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2156#comment-48431</guid>
		<description>Adam,

Interesting.  In the hosting world there are all sorts of solutions to email management.  From simple ones like procmail to complete management software to handle responses, filter, give replies from a knowledgebase etc.

It sounds like the parking companies need to hire a few linux admins and add some email features to their parking plans!

OR perhaps their is no customer interest?  That&#039;s a good poll question, I bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>Interesting.  In the hosting world there are all sorts of solutions to email management.  From simple ones like procmail to complete management software to handle responses, filter, give replies from a knowledgebase etc.</p>
<p>It sounds like the parking companies need to hire a few linux admins and add some email features to their parking plans!</p>
<p>OR perhaps their is no customer interest?  That&#8217;s a good poll question, I bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/comment-page-1#comment-48429</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2156#comment-48429</guid>
		<description>What I initially meant was in reply to your &quot;If parking companies are not already doing email management&quot; .. . I&#039;m not aware of parking companies handling anything to do with email. 

Also, I don&#039;t believe the returning of undeliverable mails with a message is quite the same as typical auto-responders really. Auto-responders typically work on valid email addresses and I think they are handled differently than a &quot;no valid email&quot; type of bounce. 

I guess it is a form of auto-responding, but you&#039;d have to &#039;wild card&#039; your auto-response to handle all the invalid emails as well and at the same time filter out the spam before you replied back. Not sure of the technical parts associated with either so can&#039;t speak on that.   

Capturing the emails would be a whole different matter since they aren&#039;t really opting in by accidentally emailing.  What are you going to do with the &quot;captured&quot; addresses?

I don&#039;t know of any parking company doing this and I don&#039;t know any domain owner doing what you describe either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I initially meant was in reply to your &#8220;If parking companies are not already doing email management&#8221; .. . I&#8217;m not aware of parking companies handling anything to do with email. </p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t believe the returning of undeliverable mails with a message is quite the same as typical auto-responders really. Auto-responders typically work on valid email addresses and I think they are handled differently than a &#8220;no valid email&#8221; type of bounce. </p>
<p>I guess it is a form of auto-responding, but you&#8217;d have to &#8216;wild card&#8217; your auto-response to handle all the invalid emails as well and at the same time filter out the spam before you replied back. Not sure of the technical parts associated with either so can&#8217;t speak on that.   </p>
<p>Capturing the emails would be a whole different matter since they aren&#8217;t really opting in by accidentally emailing.  What are you going to do with the &#8220;captured&#8221; addresses?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know of any parking company doing this and I don&#8217;t know any domain owner doing what you describe either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too Many Secrets</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-companies/replycylce-taps-into-new-revenue-source-for-domain-name-owners/2156/comment-page-1#comment-48422</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Many Secrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2156#comment-48422</guid>
		<description>Adam,

Do you mean no one is using auto-responders for their email?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>Do you mean no one is using auto-responders for their email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

