<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will new gTLDs drive up value of corresponding .com domains?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-gtlds/will-new-gtlds-drive-up-value-of-corresponding-com-domains/11714/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-gtlds/will-new-gtlds-drive-up-value-of-corresponding-com-domains/11714</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yesterday Was A Good Day For This List Of Domainers &#8211; .com Owners of Corresponding gTLD Strings &#124; Accidental Domainer</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-gtlds/will-new-gtlds-drive-up-value-of-corresponding-com-domains/11714/comment-page-1#comment-82595</link>
		<dc:creator>Yesterday Was A Good Day For This List Of Domainers &#8211; .com Owners of Corresponding gTLD Strings &#124; Accidental Domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 02:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=11714#comment-82595</guid>
		<description>[...] that gTLD applications will have on the corresponding .com domains &#8211; you can read more here, here, here or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that gTLD applications will have on the corresponding .com domains &#8211; you can read more here, here, here or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When .xxx isn&#8217;t enough: Google, Apple, and Amazon push for the &#8230; &#8211; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-gtlds/will-new-gtlds-drive-up-value-of-corresponding-com-domains/11714/comment-page-1#comment-82576</link>
		<dc:creator>When .xxx isn&#8217;t enough: Google, Apple, and Amazon push for the &#8230; &#8211; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=11714#comment-82576</guid>
		<description>[...] ready for a lot of company. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) &#8230;Will new gTLDs drive up value of corresponding .com domains?Domain Name NewsWhat the Biggest Internet Land Grab Ever Means for .UsVICECompanies vie to be master [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ready for a lot of company. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) &#8230;Will new gTLDs drive up value of corresponding .com domains?Domain Name NewsWhat the Biggest Internet Land Grab Ever Means for .UsVICECompanies vie to be master [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-gtlds/will-new-gtlds-drive-up-value-of-corresponding-com-domains/11714/comment-page-1#comment-82564</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=11714#comment-82564</guid>
		<description>&quot;Will new gTLDs drive up value of corresponding .com domains?&quot;


Yes, and I&#039;ll repeat why (which I said in a comment on another blog).


If a firm acquires and manages the dot-widget registry, they&#039;ll pour millions into convincing a few thousand folks to pay $195/yr. to reserve free.widget, blue.widget, and sell.widget. Those small business owners will hit the road with their &#039;cool&#039; new website address(es) plastered on their business cards and brochures. Along comes the guy whose card says Widget.COM, who knocks on the same buyer&#039;s door. 


All things being equal, no one can effectively argue that the buyer won&#039;t view the last guy (with the Widget.COM) address as being more legitimate, and a better risk to do business with. 


That&#039;s the bottom line, and that&#039;s why the answer to your question is &quot;yes, the value of the original, authentic domain name - ending with dot-com - will increase in value; and likely already has after today.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Will new gTLDs drive up value of corresponding .com domains?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, and I&#8217;ll repeat why (which I said in a comment on another blog).</p>
<p>If a firm acquires and manages the dot-widget registry, they&#8217;ll pour millions into convincing a few thousand folks to pay $195/yr. to reserve free.widget, blue.widget, and sell.widget. Those small business owners will hit the road with their &#8216;cool&#8217; new website address(es) plastered on their business cards and brochures. Along comes the guy whose card says Widget.COM, who knocks on the same buyer&#8217;s door. </p>
<p>All things being equal, no one can effectively argue that the buyer won&#8217;t view the last guy (with the Widget.COM) address as being more legitimate, and a better risk to do business with. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the bottom line, and that&#8217;s why the answer to your question is &#8220;yes, the value of the original, authentic domain name &#8211; ending with dot-com &#8211; will increase in value; and likely already has after today.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-gtlds/will-new-gtlds-drive-up-value-of-corresponding-com-domains/11714/comment-page-1#comment-82550</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=11714#comment-82550</guid>
		<description>Silver is right.  All of the gtld&#039;s are destined to .fail


How .stupid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silver is right.  All of the gtld&#8217;s are destined to .fail</p>
<p>How .stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
