<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post Coverage on Nefarious Domain Name Activities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/news/washington-post-coverage-on-nefarious-domain-name-activities/2294/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/news/washington-post-coverage-on-nefarious-domain-name-activities/2294</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:19:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seo Swap &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ICANN De-Accredits EstDomains</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/news/washington-post-coverage-on-nefarious-domain-name-activities/2294/comment-page-1#comment-57132</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Swap &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ICANN De-Accredits EstDomains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2294#comment-57132</guid>
		<description>[...] 6, 2008. However, it seems unlikely that anybody would accept their domains with EstDomains many ties to spam emails, malware downloads, and other criminal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6, 2008. However, it seems unlikely that anybody would accept their domains with EstDomains many ties to spam emails, malware downloads, and other criminal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICANN De-Accredits EstDomains &#124; AdamDicker.com</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/news/washington-post-coverage-on-nefarious-domain-name-activities/2294/comment-page-1#comment-57067</link>
		<dc:creator>ICANN De-Accredits EstDomains &#124; AdamDicker.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2294#comment-57067</guid>
		<description>[...] 6, 2008. However, it seems unlikely that anybody would accept their domains with EstDomains many ties to spam emails, malware downloads, and other criminal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6, 2008. However, it seems unlikely that anybody would accept their domains with EstDomains many ties to spam emails, malware downloads, and other criminal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICANN De-Accredits EstDomains &#124; Domain Name News</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/news/washington-post-coverage-on-nefarious-domain-name-activities/2294/comment-page-1#comment-57057</link>
		<dc:creator>ICANN De-Accredits EstDomains &#124; Domain Name News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2294#comment-57057</guid>
		<description>[...] 6, 2008. However, it seems unlikely that anybody would accept their domains with EstDomains many ties to spam emails, malware downloads, and other criminal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6, 2008. However, it seems unlikely that anybody would accept their domains with EstDomains many ties to spam emails, malware downloads, and other criminal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privacy Protect #1 Privacy Protection. &#124; 7Wins.eu</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/news/washington-post-coverage-on-nefarious-domain-name-activities/2294/comment-page-1#comment-54117</link>
		<dc:creator>Privacy Protect #1 Privacy Protection. &#124; 7Wins.eu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2294#comment-54117</guid>
		<description>[...] Washington Post Coverage on Nefarious Domain Name Activities &#124; Domain Name NewsCyTRAP Labs - EU-IST - we help protect since 2000 ? Blog Archive ? 4 mio tax returns - Norway privacy blooper could result in surge of identity theft casesFeminist Law Professors ? Blog Archive ? Can we expect the Sarah Palin Email Privacy Act of 2009?PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - More on YouTube v. Viacom v. User PrivacyOffice of the Privacy Commissioner ? Blog Archive ? Privacy for the next decade, not next weekFree 1 Year Spyware Doctor 6 and Privacy Guardian 4.1 License Key &#124; iTechMaxPolicyBeta - Blog Archive - More on YouTube v. Viacom v. User PrivacyOffice of the Privacy Commissioner ? Blog Archive ? YouTube could reveal a lot about youMaking Social DRM work for e-books&#8212;with maximum privacy protection &#124; TeleRead: Bring the E-Books HomeFree Software Windows System Optimization Privacy Protection Tool &#124; techxplore.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Washington Post Coverage on Nefarious Domain Name Activities | Domain Name NewsCyTRAP Labs &#8211; EU-IST &#8211; we help protect since 2000 ? Blog Archive ? 4 mio tax returns &#8211; Norway privacy blooper could result in surge of identity theft casesFeminist Law Professors ? Blog Archive ? Can we expect the Sarah Palin Email Privacy Act of 2009?PolicyBeta &#8211; Blog Archive &#8211; More on YouTube v. Viacom v. User PrivacyOffice of the Privacy Commissioner ? Blog Archive ? Privacy for the next decade, not next weekFree 1 Year Spyware Doctor 6 and Privacy Guardian 4.1 License Key | iTechMaxPolicyBeta &#8211; Blog Archive &#8211; More on YouTube v. Viacom v. User PrivacyOffice of the Privacy Commissioner ? Blog Archive ? YouTube could reveal a lot about youMaking Social DRM work for e-books&#8212;with maximum privacy protection | TeleRead: Bring the E-Books HomeFree Software Windows System Optimization Privacy Protection Tool | techxplore.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickie Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/news/washington-post-coverage-on-nefarious-domain-name-activities/2294/comment-page-1#comment-50288</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickie Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=2294#comment-50288</guid>
		<description>I wonder sometimes if the domain industry will mature to the need for: title insurance and confirmed ownership. Few domainers are aware of the risk of buying stolen property (sorry for the sidetrack). Lets say you buy domainX.com for a company and pay $25,000 for it. You have a website and it&#039;s doing well, brining in $10,000 a month. Lots of great SEO and sweat equity. Turns out that in the life of ownership, the third previous owner still thinks he owns it and has it registered for eight years. It&#039;s five years into that eight year term and you now have it. How did that happen? Could be as simply as letting a yahoo or hotmail email address lapse years ago and a bad person assumed control of it, selling it at a forum or online. That new owner then sold it to you. Guess what. You can now lose that domain. You can even be charged for receiving stolen property. Where&#039;s your business? Where&#039;s that $10,000 a month to go? The $25,000 you paid. All gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder sometimes if the domain industry will mature to the need for: title insurance and confirmed ownership. Few domainers are aware of the risk of buying stolen property (sorry for the sidetrack). Lets say you buy domainX.com for a company and pay $25,000 for it. You have a website and it&#8217;s doing well, brining in $10,000 a month. Lots of great SEO and sweat equity. Turns out that in the life of ownership, the third previous owner still thinks he owns it and has it registered for eight years. It&#8217;s five years into that eight year term and you now have it. How did that happen? Could be as simply as letting a yahoo or hotmail email address lapse years ago and a bad person assumed control of it, selling it at a forum or online. That new owner then sold it to you. Guess what. You can now lose that domain. You can even be charged for receiving stolen property. Where&#8217;s your business? Where&#8217;s that $10,000 a month to go? The $25,000 you paid. All gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
