<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Solutions Responds to Front Running Allegations Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-38410</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-38410</guid>
		<description>They're still totally doing this!!!!  I Cant believe I have to wait 5 days now for these domains to come back to market!!!! UGG!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re still totally doing this!!!!  I Cant believe I have to wait 5 days now for these domains to come back to market!!!! UGG!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Solutions is Evil &#171; The Realm of the Verbal Processor</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-26252</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Solutions is Evil &#171; The Realm of the Verbal Processor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-26252</guid>
		<description>[...] tasting. Sure enough&#8230;it was Network Solutions&#8230;see articles here, here, here, andÂ here . They started this practice in December 2007.Â There has even been a class action lawsuit brought [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tasting. Sure enough&#8230;it was Network Solutions&#8230;see articles here, here, here, andÂ here . They started this practice in December 2007.Â There has even been a class action lawsuit brought [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Action Suit Against Network Solutions and ICANN Underway &#187; Domain Name News</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-24932</link>
		<dc:creator>Class Action Suit Against Network Solutions and ICANN Underway &#187; Domain Name News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-24932</guid>
		<description>[...] against front-running. In a further attempt at damage control and amongst the public outcry, NSI quickly adjusted their policies so that the domains being registered were only names searched on the homepage, so they were not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] against front-running. In a further attempt at damage control and amongst the public outcry, NSI quickly adjusted their policies so that the domains being registered were only names searched on the homepage, so they were not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE HOT JOINTS &#124; Breaking News and Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-21853</link>
		<dc:creator>THE HOT JOINTS &#124; Breaking News and Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-21853</guid>
		<description>[...] their part, Network Solutions has responded to the controversy by promising to improve customer protection [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their part, Network Solutions has responded to the controversy by promising to improve customer protection [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Nodaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-21439</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Nodaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-21439</guid>
		<description>Ken,

You may want to rethink that move to Go Daddy. They have a bad rep too. Checkout nodaddy.com for more info. I've had great luck with moniker.com so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,</p>
<p>You may want to rethink that move to Go Daddy. They have a bad rep too. Checkout nodaddy.com for more info. I&#8217;ve had great luck with moniker.com so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marge Inoferror</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-20967</link>
		<dc:creator>Marge Inoferror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-20967</guid>
		<description>This happened to me in January 2008.  Doing a whois at Network Soutions caused them to register the name I wanted - apparently for 1 year.  now they jacked up the price.

This is totally unethical of ICANN to allow these practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This happened to me in January 2008.  Doing a whois at Network Soutions caused them to register the name I wanted - apparently for 1 year.  now they jacked up the price.</p>
<p>This is totally unethical of ICANN to allow these practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-20820</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-20820</guid>
		<description>I tested it as well;  it's happening. 

I'm in the process of moving my domain from NSI to GoDaddy;  not only will I get more services for the money, but maybe this will teach NSI a lesson about trust, and how quickly it can be squandered. 

Another issue;  I manage a domain for my homeowner's association. The association decided to get rid of their web site (a very short-sighted decision, but theirs to make) and I removed the web site. NSI parked a page full of advertising there;  they were making money on my domain!  I bitched them out about it, and they changed it to a generic "Under Construction" page.  But I'd like to get back the money that THEY earned on a domain that _I_ paid for. 

Won't happen, of course. But I don't have to associate with a company with slimy business practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tested it as well;  it&#8217;s happening. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the process of moving my domain from NSI to GoDaddy;  not only will I get more services for the money, but maybe this will teach NSI a lesson about trust, and how quickly it can be squandered. </p>
<p>Another issue;  I manage a domain for my homeowner&#8217;s association. The association decided to get rid of their web site (a very short-sighted decision, but theirs to make) and I removed the web site. NSI parked a page full of advertising there;  they were making money on my domain!  I bitched them out about it, and they changed it to a generic &#8220;Under Construction&#8221; page.  But I&#8217;d like to get back the money that THEY earned on a domain that _I_ paid for. </p>
<p>Won&#8217;t happen, of course. But I don&#8217;t have to associate with a company with slimy business practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-20818</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-20818</guid>
		<description>Pathetic answer on the notification.  You are notified in the account manager account page?  I take this to mean you will not see a notice unless you already have an account.  Yea, I am signing up right now, NOT!

Maybe I am one of the few who misunderstand your perfectly good intentions for all web users, NOT!

Hoping this is the downfall of Network Solutions.  The financial downfall must have already begun and this is your corporate reaction to dwindling shares.

Go Daddy!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pathetic answer on the notification.  You are notified in the account manager account page?  I take this to mean you will not see a notice unless you already have an account.  Yea, I am signing up right now, NOT!</p>
<p>Maybe I am one of the few who misunderstand your perfectly good intentions for all web users, NOT!</p>
<p>Hoping this is the downfall of Network Solutions.  The financial downfall must have already begun and this is your corporate reaction to dwindling shares.</p>
<p>Go Daddy!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Solutions Holds Available Domain Names After Being Searched &#124; Dave Zan's Domain Name Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-20809</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Solutions Holds Available Domain Names After Being Searched &#124; Dave Zan's Domain Name Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-part-ii/1364#comment-20809</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-par... 1) We have changed the current webpage to which reserved domain names resolve to a general under construction page. Additionally, all new reserved names after tonight will not resolve to any page at all. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-par.." rel="nofollow">http://www.domainnamenews.com/registrars/network-solutions-responds-to-front-running-allegations-par..</a>. 1) We have changed the current webpage to which reserved domain names resolve to a general under construction page. Additionally, all new reserved names after tonight will not resolve to any page at all. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
