<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICANN Blames Hack on Register.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/up-to-the-minute/icann-blames-hack-on-registercom/1700/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/up-to-the-minute/icann-blames-hack-on-registercom/1700</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/up-to-the-minute/icann-blames-hack-on-registercom/1700/comment-page-1#comment-44445</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1700#comment-44445</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tuc*ws and Reg*ster are positively going to go out of business.&quot;

I&#039;ve seen various people say that over the years. So far, they&#039;ve been proven wrong.

Maybe Tucows and Register aren&#039;t as stupid as some people believe them to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tuc*ws and Reg*ster are positively going to go out of business.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen various people say that over the years. So far, they&#8217;ve been proven wrong.</p>
<p>Maybe Tucows and Register aren&#8217;t as stupid as some people believe them to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Michlick</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/up-to-the-minute/icann-blames-hack-on-registercom/1700/comment-page-1#comment-44320</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Michlick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1700#comment-44320</guid>
		<description>Frnk: Do you also avoid dealing with parking companies that own their own domain portfolio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frnk: Do you also avoid dealing with parking companies that own their own domain portfolio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frnk</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/up-to-the-minute/icann-blames-hack-on-registercom/1700/comment-page-1#comment-44275</link>
		<dc:creator>Frnk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1700#comment-44275</guid>
		<description>go*gle and yah*o are partly to blame for these registrars keeping the good names.

All go*gle has to do is ban all parked websites hosted on registrar IPs from their search and ad networks. 

No ad money for the parked sites, no more incentive for the corrupt executives running these registrars. This along with everyone moving all their domains out of these corrupt registrars. Implement the two actions and they will soon be out of business.

3 registrars I never use

Tuc*ws, Reg*ster, Networks*lutions.

Tuc*ws and Reg*ster are positively going to go out of business. The market is getting so competitive that corrupt good &#039;ol boy types are getting chewed and spit out by the professionals.

Pass on the message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go*gle and yah*o are partly to blame for these registrars keeping the good names.</p>
<p>All go*gle has to do is ban all parked websites hosted on registrar IPs from their search and ad networks. </p>
<p>No ad money for the parked sites, no more incentive for the corrupt executives running these registrars. This along with everyone moving all their domains out of these corrupt registrars. Implement the two actions and they will soon be out of business.</p>
<p>3 registrars I never use</p>
<p>Tuc*ws, Reg*ster, Networks*lutions.</p>
<p>Tuc*ws and Reg*ster are positively going to go out of business. The market is getting so competitive that corrupt good &#8216;ol boy types are getting chewed and spit out by the professionals.</p>
<p>Pass on the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/up-to-the-minute/icann-blames-hack-on-registercom/1700/comment-page-1#comment-44179</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1700#comment-44179</guid>
		<description>Not going to happen, Tracey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not going to happen, Tracey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.domainnamenews.com/up-to-the-minute/icann-blames-hack-on-registercom/1700/comment-page-1#comment-44171</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainnamenews.com/?p=1700#comment-44171</guid>
		<description>Register.com should focus on providing a secure platform for their customers rather than skimming names off the top of the expired domain lists (before sending the crap to snapnames).

I hope ICANN yanks their accreditation and the CEO is put in jail next to the CEO of Registerfly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Register.com should focus on providing a secure platform for their customers rather than skimming names off the top of the expired domain lists (before sending the crap to snapnames).</p>
<p>I hope ICANN yanks their accreditation and the CEO is put in jail next to the CEO of Registerfly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

